Armanino Blog

New PCAOB Rule – Does It Really Benefit Investors?

by Matthew Perreault
July 20, 2017

On June 1, after more than seven years of work, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) unanimously adopted a rule to expand the auditor’s report in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Their goal is to provide public company investors with more useful information.

Old Rule vs. New Rule
The current model for an auditor’s report — which has prevailed since the 1940s — is a simple pass-fail statement. Although auditors know many details about a client’s financial condition, the existing reporting model provides no opportunity for auditors to offer insight to investors. In fact, in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, some regulators and investors observed that external auditors said nothing in their reports about companies that were on the brink of failure.

The revised model would require auditors to discuss critical audit matters (CAMs) that arose during their audits of clients and provide information about clients’ financial reporting practices. The PCAOB defines CAMs as issues that:

  • Have been communicated to the audit committee
  • Are related to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements, and
  • Involved especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments from the auditor

The new rule is largely based on the proposed requirements in PCAOB Release No. 2016-003, Proposed Auditing Standard — The Auditor’s Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion, and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards, which was issued in May 2016. The PCAOB began the project in 2010 with outreach to investors, auditors, audit committee members and companies about changing the auditor’s report.

Close-Up on the Changes
In addition to discussing CAMs, the new rule would require that audit reports include the phrase “whether due to error or fraud” in describing the auditor’s responsibility to ensure that the financial statements are accurate. An auditor’s report also would include a statement that the auditor is required to be independent. The new rule standardizes the form of the auditor’s report, with the opinion appearing in the first section. Section titles would be added to guide the reader, and the report would be addressed to the company’s shareholders and board of directors.

Additionally, the new rule would require accounting firms to disclose the number of years they have been a company’s auditor. Investors want this information to help them assess the potential risks to auditor independence. Some investors believe that long-term relationships between accounting firms and clients can create a conflict of interest that causes auditors to identify too closely with clients and not the investors they’re supposed to represent. In their view, the risk of a conflict of interest undermines the quality of the auditor’s work.

PCAOB member Jeanette Franzel has been skeptical about the new auditor-tenure disclosures and has argued that investors aren’t as concerned about an accounting firm’s tenure as proponents of the requirement say. She is concerned that including this information in the auditor’s report may convey an implication that there is a generalizable relationship between auditor tenure and audit quality and/or auditor independence ― assumptions that may not be valid.

Changes Pending
All major PCAOB decisions are subject to SEC approval under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. So, the expanded audit report still has one more hurdle to pass before it goes into effect. On June 8, SEC Chief Accountant Wesley Bricker expressed support for expanding the audit report, saying that the changes were long overdue in response to the evolving needs of investors. However, Bricker said the SEC will carefully consider any comments it receives before making its final decision.

If the new rule is approved by the SEC, auditors will start communicating CAMs for public audit clients with more than $700 million in market value for fiscal years ending on or after June 30, 2019. For companies below that threshold, the effective date will be December 15, 2020.

The new rule doesn’t apply to audits of emerging growth companies, which have less than $1 billion in revenue. This class of companies gets a host of regulatory breaks for five years after becoming public, under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act.

July 20, 2017

Stay In Touch

Sign up to stay up-to-date with the latest accounting regulations, best practices, industry news and technology insights to run your business.

Related News & Insights
SaaS Market Trends
Between the uncertainty of 2022 and the highs of 2021, what will 2023 hold?

December 14, 2022 | 09:00 AM - 10:00 AM PT
Fraud: Current Trends & Hot Topics
Don’t let fraud negatively impact your organization.

December 8, 2022 | 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM PT
Year-End Tax Planning for High-Net-Worth Individuals
Optimize your tax position before December 31.

December 8, 2022 | 09:00 AM - 10:00 AM PT