Armanino Blog

Are You Ready for the New Lease Standard?

by Grant Lam
January 09, 2018

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has decided to issue a proposal that would make the much-anticipated lease accounting standard easier to apply. It calls for changes to how companies make the transition to the new accounting and revises the guidance for lessors.

Refresher on lease accounting

The current lease accounting standard, Leases (Topic 840), requires companies to record lease obligations on their balance sheets only if the arrangements meet the criteria to be a capital lease, which are essentially financing transactions, such as rent-to-own contracts for buildings or vehicles. Many lease arrangements are not recognized on the balance sheet, however, because the leases are structured as an operating lease. Under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), operating leases are not recognized on the balance sheet. 

One of the biggest criticisms of the current lease accounting model is that lease commitments from operating leases are not recorded on the balance sheet, which may make a business look less leveraged than it really is.

After nearly a decade of debate, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The new standard calls for major changes to current accounting practices for leases. In a nutshell, companies will be required to recognize on their balance sheets the assets and liabilities associated with all leases, with the only exception being leases shorter than 12 months. The effects of the new standard are expected to be pervasive, because nearly all businesses lease property and equipment. 

ASU No. 2016-02 defines a lease as a contract (or part of a contract) that conveys the right to control the use of a rented asset. The concept of control is a key change from the definition of a lease. It means that the customer has both the right to realize substantially all of the economic benefits of the asset and the right to direct the asset’s use. 

Most existing arrangements that currently are reported as leases will continue to be reported as leases under the new standard. In addition, the new definition is expected to encompass many more types of arrangements that aren’t reported as leases under current practice.

Relaxed guidance

In recent months, public companies and their auditors have started to express concerns that they won’t be ready to follow the new lease accounting by the 2019 compliance date. They’re especially concerned about the following:  the lack of commercially available software to help them follow the new recognition and measurement requirements; the lack of resources available, especially considering the new revenue recognition standards will have to be adopted; the difficulty in gathering the necessary lease data to implement the change; and  the complicated disclosure rules.

So, the FASB has agreed to ease some of the implementation hurdles by making certain revisions to the new standard and providing some practical expedients. The first proposed revision relates to how businesses will transition to the new standard from the current guidance. The new standard requires companies to follow a modified retrospective approach. In other words, as businesses adopt the standard, they’ll need to present prior period information following the new lease accounting standard.

The retrospective transition requirement is intended to help investors and analysts more accurately compare prior periods. But businesses recently told the FASB that the presentation of the income statements and balance sheets from prior years was a significant undertaking, especially because few software solutions exist yet to help companies apply the new lease accounting standard and the effort involved to gather data from prior periods would be difficult. In response, the FASB has proposed making this requirement optional and, instead, allowing companies upon adoption of the new lease accounting standard to continue to present results using the current lease guidance for prior periods. 

The majority of FASB members believe this change will help companies avoid the costs and complexities associated with “looking backward” and give management more time to focus on accounting for current and future transactions. One FASB member, a former fund manager and securities analyst, voted against the proposed change because he sees it as a disservice to investors and analysts. 

The second proposed change would add a practical expedient that would allow lessors the option to not separate nonlease components from the related lease components if certain conditions are met. Lessors and property managers have been especially vocal about the burden of being required to break out the fees for “common area maintenance” charges, such as security, elevator repairs and snow removal. They argued that it’s cumbersome to account for these items separately from the charges associated with renting out land or buildings. So, the FASB has agreed to give lessors the option not to separately account for the fees.

Stay tuned

The FASB plans to float the proposed changes for a 30-day public comment period. But, there’s limited time for the accounting board to finalize these changes. Public companies have to follow the new lease accounting in 2019, while private companies have a one-year reprieve.

Special Exception for Land Easements

In November, the FASB unanimously agreed to provide a practical expedient whereby organizations would not have to reconsider their accounting for existing land easements that aren’t currently accounted for under the current lease standard. Under the revised guidance, businesses such as oil and gas companies and energy providers that hold land easements won’t have to sort through years of old contracts to determine whether they meet the definition of a lease under Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842).

A land easement agreement might, for example, give a company the right to pass a pipeline through a field or run an electric cable over a farm. The owners of the land typically continue to use the land as before. Businesses that hold land easements sometimes account for them as leases, but others account for them under Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), or Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360).

Companies that don’t currently account for their land easements as leases told the FASB it would be a large undertaking to sort through their contracts to determine if they meet the definition of a lease from the new standard. Most easements aren’t expected to fit the definition. Of the easements that do fit the definition, many are prepaid and already recognized on the balance sheet.

This practical expedient applies only to existing land easements, however. Once the new lease standard is in place, companies must determine if new land easements they acquire fit within the standard’s scope.

January 09, 2018

Stay In Touch

Sign up to stay up-to-date with the latest accounting regulations, best practices, industry news and technology insights to run your business.

Grant Lam - Partner, Audit - San Francisco CA
Related News & Insights
Sage Transform VIP Experience
Live Event
VIP luncheon for top finance executives attending Sage Intacct 2022.

October 12, 2022 | 09:30 AM - 10:45 AM PT
Women in Life Sciences: Women’s Health & Wellness
Spill the Tea With Delphine O’Rourke on the State of Women’s Health

October 11, 2022 | 02:00 PM - 03:30 PM PT
ASC 842: Lessons Learned From Early Adopters
Get the scoop from early adopters who have implemented ASC 842.

October 6, 2022 | 09:00 AM - 10:00 AM PT