Federal DOL Withdraws Independent Contractor Rule
Article

Federal DOL Withdraws Independent Contractor Rule

by Rosie Aguilar
November 09, 2021

There has been some confusion over a new federal rule for worker classification. Here’s where things stand.

Effective May 6, 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) withdrew a final rule published in January 2021 that would have given employers an easier way to classify workers as independent contractors under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Since the rule was withdrawn before it took effect, DOL guidance on worker classification determinations remains unchanged. Employers should continue to apply federal guidance and DOL Fact Sheet 13.

Background

The DOL issued a ruling at the beginning of 2021 in which it revised its interpretation of independent contractors under the FLSA at the federal level to adopt an “economic reality” test. However, after receiving pushback and extending the original effective date of March 8, 2021, to May 7, 2021, the DOL withdrew the independent contractor rule on May 6, 2021.

The department stated that the rule was “inconsistent with FLSA’s text and purpose, and would have had a confusing and disruptive effect on workers and businesses alike due to its departure from longstanding judicial precedent.”

The FLSA comes into play because of its governance over minimum wage, overtime, equal pay and employee recordkeeping. To determine whether FLSA rules apply to workers, the worker must be classified as either an employee or an independent contractor.

What Was the Independent Contractor Rule Going to Change?

The rule was going to expand on the economic reality aspect of the federal guidance with regard to worker classification.

Previously the DOL determined that an employer-employee relationship existed if the worker was economically dependent on the employer. However, the DOL never went deeper to define economic dependence, nor did it set a single rule, or test, for determining if a worker should be classified as an independent contractor or an employee. The change would have provided the following test for determining economic dependence:

Core factors:

  1. What is the nature and degree of the worker’s control over the work?
  2. What is the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss based on initiative and/or investment?

Additional factors:

  1. What is the amount of skill required for the work?
  2. What is the degree of permanence of the working relationship between the worker and the potential employer?
  3. Is the work part of an integrated unit of production?

The rule also included several examples to show how the economic reality factors could be analyzed.

What Does the Final Outcome Mean for Your Business?

It’s important to know if the state where you have workers has its own worker classification ruling. For example, California operates under Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5), which instituted the ABC test. Other states have similar bills that supersede federal guidance.

However, if the state is silent on the issue, federal guidance must be applied. Since the rule was withdrawn, federal DOL guidance on worker classification determinations remains unchanged. Courts have upheld that there is no single rule or test for determination but instead they look at the whole picture and consider all factors, such as the ones listed below:

  1. The extent to which the services rendered are an integral part of the principal’s business
  2. The permanency of the relationship
  3. The amount of the alleged contractor’s investment in facilities and equipment
  4. The nature and degree of control by the principal
  5. The alleged contractor’s opportunities for profit and loss
  6. The amount of initiative, judgment or foresight in open market competition with others required for the success of the claimed independent contractor
  7. The degree of independent business organization and operation

For questions or assistance, contact our HR outsourcing experts.

Stay In Touch

Sign up to stay up-to-date with the latest accounting regulations, best practices, industry news and technology insights to run your business.

Author
Rosie Aguilar - Manager, Consulting - El Segundo, CA | Armanino
Manager
Resources
Related News & Insights
Implications of CA Supreme Court’s Decision on Meal and Rest Breaks
Article
Employers must pay premium payments for missed meal, rest and recovery breaks at the employee’s regular rate of pay.

November 05, 2021
Vaccine Mandates in the Workplace: 4 Key Considerations for Employers
Artcile
Employers should consider the impact on their operations and ways to offer reasonable accommodations to retain talent.

October 26, 2021
Regulatory and Industry News Alerts from Armanino
Article
Employers with 20+ employees must act now to identify and notify eligible individuals.

April 02, 2021